The Maltese Connection – could the next Vatican’s Secretary of State be a Maltese too?

On the 11th February 2013, soon after Pope Benedict XVI celebrated the mass commemorating the 900th anniversary from the foundation of the Sovereign Military Hospitalier Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, also known as Order of Malta, he announced his resignation. The first Pope ever in the Church’s history to resign on voluntary basis, so we’re told.

The Order of Malta at the Vatican on 11th February 2013

We don’t think this is a coincidence. During the commemorative ceremony Pope Benedict XVI said the following:

“This important event takes on a special meaning in the context of the Year of the Faith, during which the Church is called to renew the joy and the commitment of belief in Jesus Christ, the one Saviour of the world. In this regard, you too are called to welcome this time of grace, so as to deepen your knowledge of the Lord and to cause the truth and beauty of the faith to shine forth, through the witness of your lives and your service, in this present time.”

The role of the Knights of Malta was (and still is) to defend Christianity and the Christians. In 1530, seven years after losing their base in Rhodes and moving from place to another in Europe, the Knights set foot on Malta when Charles V of Spain, as King of Sicily, gave them the Maltese Islands.

In 1565, the Ottoman Sultan, Suleiman the Magnificent, sent an invasion force of about 40,000 men to besiege the 700 knights and 8,000 Maltese and expel them from Malta and gain a new base from which to possibly launch another assault on Europe. The French scholar Voltaire, describing the 1565 Siege on Malta said, “Nothing is better known than the siege of Malta,” and it undoubtedly contributed to the eventual erosion of the European perception of Ottoman invincibility and marked a new phase in Spanish domination of the Mediterranean. The siege was the climax of an escalating contest between a Christian alliance and the Ottoman Empire for control of the Mediterranean. This siege was also prophesied by Nostradamus which took place during his lifetime.

To this day Malta still stands as the rocca forte of the Catholic church. Malta has a population that is strongly tied to the Roman Catholic Church. In fact the Constitution of Malta establishes Catholicism as the state religion. Catholicism is also present in various elements of Maltese culture. No wonder that in the last 25 years, Malta, one of the world’s smallest nations with just over 400,000 inhabitants, has been visited three times by a Pope (twice by Pope John Paul II and once by Pope Benedict XVI).

Malta’s main patron saint is St Paul, who allegedly got shipwrecked in Malta in 60AD and converted the Maltese to Christianity. The feast of the Assumption of Mary (15th August) is also widely celebrated also due to the fact that on the same day in 1942 a relief convoy as part of Operation Pedestal made it through the Axis’ blockade during the Second World War. This is commonly known as the Santa Maria Convoy. Fortress Malta, as it was known, was about to surrender. Had this happened, the Axis would have taken control of the entire Mediterranean and today Europe and the rest the rest of the world might be living another reality.

However the connection doesn’t stop there. Since Pope Benedict XVI announced his resignation, two Maltese clergymen got highly ranked posts in the vatican close to the Pontiff.


Mgr Antoine Camilleri

On the 22nd February 2013,  Mgr. Antoine Camilleri, was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI to the third highest ranking post in the Vatican, making him under-secretary to the Holy-See’s relations with States. He replaces Mgr. Ettore Balestrero, who has been controversially appointed as Nuncio to Colombia, following reports about his close relations with Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone, and his liaisons with the beleaguered Vatican bank IOR. Balestrero’s  replacement and appointment as Nuncio to Colombia is being considered as a kick-upstairs in a bid to keep him away from Rome.


Mgr Alfred Xuereb (right) assisting Pope Benedict XVI

On the 18th March 2013, Mgr. Alfred Xuereb born in Victoria, Malta in 1958, became Honorary Prelate of the Roman Catholic Church, and first private secretary of Pope Francis I. Before being selected, he had served, next to the private secretary Georg Gänswein, as second private secretary of Pope Benedict XVI.

However  the most important Maltese clergyman in the last decade has surely been Mgr Charles Jude Scicluna, the Vatican’s top prosecutor on child sex abuse cases. Scicluna became promoter of justice at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 2002 to handle accusations of clerical sex abuse, after the doctrinal congregation was given the authority in 2001 to take over such cases from local bishops for investigation.

In 2005, as one of his most trusted men, Cardinal Ratzinger  (who later that year became Pope Benedict XVI) sent Scicluna to Mexico and New York to collect testimony against the founder of the Legionaries of Christ, Fr Marcial Maciel, amid allegations of abuse.

Scicluna took a tough stance against abusive priests, saying the church must respond to allegations in a very clear way, and not react with “inertia, a culture of silence or repression.”

He also said that greater transparency and the protection of children are integral to the good of the universal church, and called for greater accountability under church law of bishops who shield or fail to discipline abusive priests.

The Archdiocese of Malta set up a sex-abuse “Response Team” in 1999. By 2010, the team had received accusations against 45 priests in connection with more than 80 allegations of sexual abuse against minors. Malta, which is 98 percent Catholic, has a population of 410,000.

Several Maltese priests have faced criminal trials in civil courts after victims, reportedly dissatisfied with the Response Team’s handling of their cases, chose to go to the police.

Some victims have accused the local church of delaying its own internal investigations pending the outcome of the criminal court cases.

Many believe Mgr Scicluna was sent to Malta to help with the situation and save possibly the last stronghold of the catholic faith.

For the first time, Pope Benedict XVI met with victims of abuse during a trip to Malta in 2010 and assured them that the church would do everything in its power to investigate allegations, punish those responsible and implement effective measures to protect children.


Aux. Bishop Mgr Charles Jude Scicluna

On the 6th October 2012 Pope Benedict XVI named him Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Malta and at the same time Titular Bishop of San Leone. In an interview on the eve of his departure from Rome, Scicluna insisted he wasn’t the latest casualty in the Vatican’s turf battles and Machiavellian personnel intrigues. Rather, he said, his promotion to auxiliary bishop in his native Malta was simply that — “a very good” promotion — and more critically, that his hardline stance against sex abuse would remain, because it is Benedict’s stance as well. “This is policy,” he told The Associated Press. “It’s not Scicluna. It’s the pope. And this will remain.” He added, “If you want to silence someone, you don’t make him a bishop.”

He was conscrated bishop on the 24th November 2012. On the 1st December 2012 Bishop Scicluna was appointed a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith for a five year renewable term by Pope Benedict.

With such an apostolic career behind him, could it be that Bishop Scicluna would be called again to Rome, this time to fill the post of Secretary of State of the Vatican?


Two Popes and a Comet – on the doorstep of a new era

two popes4

Since the launch of this blog, we have been feeding information. The reader might have thought that we’re derailing from the topic and that our argumentation might be rather disjointed. Below is a first convergence of facts.

With reference to the pages and posts about Pope Leo XIII and his coat of arms, and the page about the Comet ISON, one cannot ignore the fact that we are living or are about to witness what was prophesied on the Pope Leo XIII’s coat of arms.


The real meaning behind Pope Leo XIII’s coat of arms is clear:

The tree represents the Church. The grey band represents the division between the two eras, below our current time and the above it the new era. The two fleur-de-lis (a symbol of the kings) actually represent the two concurrent Popes (kings) that we have now (Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Francis I). Above there’s a comet meaning that a particular comet will signal the new era of the Catholics. Like Halley’s Comet announced the birth of the Messiah, Comet ISON will be doing the same of the Second Coming of the Messiah.

One might ask what has this coat of arms from a pope over a century ago got to do with all this. Pope Leo XIII had a vision of the end of our time. In this vision Satan asked Christ for a period of 100 years time to destroy what’s so dear to God – the church and its people. The 100 years are about to end.

“And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light”, 2 Corinthians 14

What if the person seated on the throne of Rome and his college of Cardinals are a disguise? Looking at the background of the Jesuits, despite the fact that they do a lot of good around the world, one cannot forget the controversies the Jesuits accumulated around their movement over the centuries. And now they’re heading the church. The King of the Catholics is for the first time a Jesuit.

In his second letter to the Corinthians, St Paul talks about false apostles and says:

12 And what I am doing I will continue to do, in order to undermine the claim of those who would like to claim that in their boasted mission they work on the same terms as we do. 13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen,disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. 14 And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. 15 So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.

Pope-Francis-I-open2-jpgAs we said in an earlier post before the conclusion of the conclave, the Pope to be elected was not going to be Peter the Roman, in fact he is Francis I. We also explained in another previous post that a prophecy (in this case that of St. Malachy) needs to be fulfilled 100%, hence the real Pope, Peter the Roman (Petrus Romanus), is yet to appear on the scene. Taking also into account the Fatima sectret one must not ignore the fact that the third part of this prophecy is yet to be fulfilled and a Pope shall be killed (or sacrificed). The Catholic Church tried to sell the idea that the third part of the Fatima secret referred to the shooting of Pope John Paul II in 1981, but this Pope was not killed by the gunshot so the prophecy was not fulfilled as the Catholic Church wants us to believe. 

How is this going to happen? Who will be Petrus Romanus? And above all where shall be the new Holy See be located once the city of the seven hills (i.e. Rome) is destroyed or loses its title?

More revelations are to come, and we shall see that even the Nostradamus prophecies match the prophecies inspired by the Holy Spirit or Our Lady like those of St Malachy and the Fatima Secret.

An insight of the last ten Popes

We have just added a new section about the Prophecy of the Popes by Saint Malachy. It concerns the last ten popes that came before Francis I. We have given our own interpretation of the mottoes of each Pope. We believe that the last ten Popes are crucial in what we’re trying to predict, because these are the Popes of the 100 years mentioned in the vision of Pope Leo XIII.

Click here to go to the article.

What is the difference between a prediction and a prophecy?

Many think that prediction and prophecy are the same but they’re mistaken. It’s true that they both forecast the future but there’s a difference!

A prediction is a forecast made by those who calculate the parameters of the subject involved and after evaluating al the odds they can predict the future. The weather forecast is a classical example. An experienced teacher can predict that one of his students is brilliant and will have a successful career, but at the age of 21 the student tragically dies. The teacher’s prediction would have been correct, however never fulfilled because the variable of the tragic death at young age was not taken into account.

The prophecy is another story. The ancient Pharaohs of Egypt used to say “So shall it be written and so shall it be done”. And so is the prophecy. Once written it is to be fulfilled without exceptions. A prophecy has all the ingredients except the element of time. Without the element of time a prophecy is hard to pinpoint because history tends to rhyme from time to time. Nevertheless we believe that in the last century or so there have been prophetic visions with some time element (more information to follow in future articles).

A typical example is Bible prophecy. Jesus Christ was prophesied centuries ahead of His time. A host of prophets in the old testament heralded his coming, and yet many did not recognise Him and was crucified. The Jews waited for so long the coming of their Messiah that when he came he was not recognised despite having in their hands a book with one third prophecy, the Bible.

Time Magazine cover - Pope John Paul II forgiving the shooter of his assassination attempt

Time Magazine cover – Pope John Paul II forgiving the shooter of his assassination attempt

Therefore when the Vatican says that the third part of the Fatima secret (actually prophecy would be more appropriate) is referring to the 1981 attempt assassination of Pope John Paul II, they are either wrong or they want us to believe so not to cause speculation like we are doing here. The third part of the Fatima secret clearly states that a Pope is to be killed – Pope John Paul II survived the assassination attempt, therefore this prophecy is yet to be fulfilled, possibly by Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI.

Therefore since a prophecy cannot be altered why is it written? A prophecy is just a tool to warn us to be prepared for the unexpected eventualities. Nobody knows the moment of the final judgement but when it shall come we ought to be prepared. And be prepared because the signs are out there and we can speculate that the second coming is in the not so distant future.     

Astrology is for fools!

Someone once said that Astrology is about as vacant as the space that it worships. In fact the Catholic church considers that the consultation of horoscopes, astrology, palm reading, interpretation of omens and lots, the phenomena of clairvoyance, and recourse to mediums contradicts the honour, respect, and loving fear that man owes to God alone.

The pagan world was dominated by belief in astrology. Pagans believed that the stars were divinities, or that they were controlled by divinities. Apollo was the god of the sun, his sister Diana was the goddess of the moon, and the known planets were named after gods as well (Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn). Because of this common pagan belief, the Old Testament contains repeated injunctions against star-worship (Deut. 4:19, 17:3; 2 Kgs. 17:16, 21:3–5, 23:4; Jer. 8:2, 19:12–13; Zeph. 1:4–6).

In the New Testament age, astrologers taught that all things were in the grip of Fate, which could assign one destiny to one man and another destiny to another. Fate was extremely powerful and sometimes was even said to rule the gods. However, what destiny Fate would assign to a man could be determined by reading the stars.

Today some Christians are influenced by revived paganism in the form of the New Age movement. Some even suggest that Christianity originally held many occult beliefs, such as astrology. But the early Christians, like the early Jews, were vehemently opposed to astrology, even attributing it to demonic origin.

The Church Fathers were willing to impose strong sanctions against astrology to protect their flocks. In A.D. 120, the noted mathematician Aquila Ponticus was excommunicated from the Church at Rome for astrological heresies.

Nevertheless one must not forget that in many instances the in both old and new testaments, there is a reference to celestial bodies and natural events (planets, stars, sun, comets and the plagues on Egypt). However these have to be taken in their symbolic sense only.  For example the star of Bethlehem appeared and the sky to signify the birth of Christ. Today we know from science that this was Haley’s comet. But the stars and planets don’t determine our fate!

Astrology is for fools!